Funding Rounds' Cheat Sheet 2026: Everything you need to know
Raising capital is one of the most critical challenges facing startup founders. Understanding the different funding rounds—from Pre-Seed to IPO—can mean the difference between successfully scaling your business and running out of runway. This comprehensive guide breaks down everything you need to know about startup funding rounds, including how much to raise, who to approach, and what investors expect at each stage.
But let’s be honest about what you’re getting into.
Of 1,119 seed-stage tech companies tracked in a comprehensive study, only 48% raised a second round. By the sixth round, only 3% remained. And the ultimate prize; unicorn status? Just 1% achieved it. The harsh reality is that 67% of startups become “zombies” neither growing nor dying, just surviving.
The harsh reality: Starting with 1,119 seed companies, only 1% become unicorns while 67% become self-sustaining zombies. Source: Seed company cohort analysis
This is the Power Law in action. In any given venture portfolio, 2-4 companies out of 100 will generate returns that multiply the entire fund. The rest? They either fail or return modest outcomes. Your job as a founder is to convince investors that you’re going to be in that 1-2%.
Now that we’ve set realistic expectations, let’s dive into how funding rounds actually work.
What Types of Funding Round are there?
A funding round is a stage in the investment lifecycle where a startup raises capital from investors in exchange for equity ownership. Each round represents a milestone in your company’s growth journey, with distinct goals, investor types, and expectations.
Funding rounds are typically labeled alphabetically—Series A, Series B, Series C, and so on—with each successive round occurring as the company matures and requires additional capital to scale. Before the traditional series rounds, many startups also go through Pre-Seed and Seed funding stages. The following infographic will give you a general understanding of what normally happens on each type of round:
The complete journey: From 100% ownership at the idea stage to ~17% at IPO. Notice how “100% of nothing is a lot less than 17% of a big company.” Source: Anna Vital
Here’s the key insight many first-time founders miss: Yes, you’ll give up equity at each round. But as the infographic above shows, owning 17% of a $2.6 billion company (worth ~$442 million) is infinitely better than owning 100% of a company worth nothing.
Pre-Seed and Seed Funding: Getting Started
The earliest funding stages help founders transform their ideas into working products with initial market traction. These stages are crucial for validating your concept and building a foundation for future growth.
Pre-Seed Funding
Pre-seed funding is the earliest stage of startup financing, often occurring before a company has a product or significant traction. At this stage, you’re typically working with a small team (or solo) to develop a prototype or proof-of-concept.
Pre-seed funding helps founders get their business off the ground by funding initial market research, prototype development, and early team building. This stage is about validating your idea and building something investors can evaluate in future rounds.
Average Amount: Pre-seed rounds typically range from $100,000 to $2 million, though amounts vary significantly based on the industry, location, and founder experience.
Common Investors: Founders themselves (bootstrapping), friends and family, angel investors, accelerators and incubators, and specialized pre-seed venture capital firms.
Primary Uses: Building a minimum viable product (MVP), conducting market research and validation, hiring founding team members, developing initial go-to-market strategies, and establishing basic company infrastructure.
Seed Funding
Seed funding is the first official equity funding stage for most startups. It represents the initial capital that helps transform an idea into a functioning business with early market traction. The name comes from the agricultural metaphor—this is the “seed” capital that will hopefully grow into a thriving company.
Seed funding is used to finance the early stages of a business, including product development, market research, and building your core team. This is the stage where you prove product-market fit and prepare for scaling.
Average Amount: Seed rounds typically range from $500,000 to $2 million, with company valuations between $3 million and $6 million. However, seed rounds have grown significantly larger in recent years, with some tech startups raising $5 million or more.
Common Investors: Angel investors (most common at this stage), seed-stage venture capital firms, accelerator programs (Y Combinator, Techstars, etc.), super angels and angel groups, and early-stage crowdfunding platforms.
What You Should Have: To successfully raise a seed round, you should have a working prototype or MVP, clear product-market fit hypothesis, initial user traction or pilot customers, a compelling pitch deck (10-15 slides), financial projections for the next 18-24 months, and a strong founding team with relevant expertise.
The Valley of Death: Why Most Startups Fail Between Seed and Series A
There’s a dangerous period that kills more startups than bad products, weak teams, or market downturns. It’s called the “Valley of Death,” and it happens right after you raise your seed round.
Here’s what happens: You raise $500K to $2M in seed funding. You’re excited. You hire a few people, build your product, get some early traction. Eighteen months later, you’re running out of cash. You go out to raise Series A. And that’s when you hit the wall.
The Valley of Death: Where funding need peaks but available funding hits its lowest point. This is where most startups die.
The chart above shows the brutal reality. At the seed stage, your funding needs are high—you’re burning cash to build product and prove traction. But available funding sources hit their lowest point. Angels have moved on to other deals. VCs want to see more metrics. You’re stuck in the valley.
Remember the Carta data I mentioned earlier? In 2024, only 2-5% of seed companies successfully raised Series A. In 2021, it was 15%. The valley has gotten deeper and wider.
The valley of death is real. It’s not about your product being bad or your team being weak. It’s about the mismatch between your cash needs and available funding sources at this specific stage. Plan for it, prepare for it, and execute with the discipline of someone who knows the stakes.
Series A Through Series F: Scaling and Growth
Once a startup has proven its initial concept and achieved product-market fit, it enters the series funding rounds. Each successive round helps the company scale to new heights, from optimizing the business model to achieving market dominance.
Series A Funding: Scaling Your Business Model
Series A funding marks a major milestone in a startup’s journey. By this stage, you’ve proven that your product works and people want it. Now it’s time to optimize your business model and scale. This is the first significant round of venture capital financing, where investors expect you to have a clear plan for developing a sustainable business model and generating long-term revenue.
Average Amount: Series A rounds typically raise between $2 million and $15 million, with an average of around $19 million as of 2024. Company valuations at this stage usually range from $10 million to $50 million.
Common Investors: Venture capital firms (primary investors), some angel investors (typically previous investors), corporate venture arms, and equity crowdfunding platforms (increasingly common). Notable Series A investors include Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Google Ventures.
Key Milestones Expected: Product-market fit with clear evidence that customers want and use your product, revenue traction (many VCs look for $1-2 million in ARR for SaaS companies), strong month-over-month or quarter-over-quarter growth metrics, healthy unit economics with a clear path to profitability, and proof that your business model can scale efficiently.
The Series A Crunch: This is where many startups fail to raise additional capital. According to CB Insights, only 46% of seed-funded companies successfully raise a Series A round. This phenomenon occurs because investors have much higher expectations at this stage, requiring proven traction and a viable path to profitability.
However, we’re seeing a higher rate in the last data gathered by Carta:
The Series A Crunch in action: In 2021, 14-15% of seed companies raised Series A. In 2024? Just 2-5%. Source: Carta, 11,384 US seed startups
Look at that heatmap. In Q1 2021, during the peak of the funding boom, about 14-15% of seed companies successfully raised Series A within 48 months. That was the easiest fundraising environment in recent history.
Fast forward to 2024, and the numbers are brutal. Q2 2024 shows just 2-3% graduation rates. The market has completely flipped. What worked three years ago doesn’t work today.
This is why I keep emphasizing the importance of understanding the current market. You’re not competing against startups from 2021 who raised at 100x revenue multiples. You’re competing in 2024/2025, where VCs are being extremely selective and metrics matter more than ever.
The good news? If you can navigate this environment and raise a Series A in 2024-2025, you’re in the elite group. The companies that survive this period will be fundamentally stronger than those that raised in easy times.
Funding Round Benchmarks: 2025 Data You Need to Know
Let’s cut through the noise and look at actual numbers. Not what some blog post says you “should” raise, but what software startups actually raised in 2025.
This data comes from 2,401 rounds raised by US software startups between May and October 2025. These are the real benchmarks you should be comparing yourself against:
Complete funding benchmarks: From $500K pre-seed rounds to $2B+ Series D rounds, with post-money valuations, cash raised, and dilution percentages. Source: Carta, May-October 2025
Key Insights from the Data
A few patterns jump out:
SAFE rounds ($500K-$2M) have lower dilution. Median 11.7% vs. 19% for priced seed. Why? SAFEs delay the valuation conversation, and conversion often happens at better terms if you hit milestones.
The gap between 25th and 75th percentile widens at later stages. At seed, 25th percentile is $13.9M and 75th is $35M (2.5x difference). At Series D, it’s $152M to $2,087M (13.7x difference). Success compounds.
Dilution decreases with stage. Median seed dilution is 19%, Series A is 17%, Series C is 9.8%, Series D is 7.3%. Later-stage companies have more leverage.
The “typical” Series A is bigger than you think. Median is $10.8M raised at $67M post-money. If you’re planning to raise $5M, you’re actually below median. Plan accordingly.
What If You’re Below the Benchmarks?
Don’t panic. These are software startup benchmarks, which tend to be at the higher end. If you’re in hardware, biotech, or consumer, your numbers might be different. Geography matters too—Silicon Valley rounds are typically larger than other markets.
But if you’re a US software startup and you’re significantly below the 25th percentile, ask yourself why:
Are your metrics weak compared to peers?
Are you targeting the wrong investors?
Is your market too small or too crowded?
Are you undervaluing your company?
Sometimes you take a below-market deal because it’s the only deal on the table. That’s fine. But know what you’re signing up for, and use this data to negotiate as hard as you can.
Remember: These numbers represent thousands of actual deals. This is the market. Price yourself accordingly.
How to Raise a Round Without a Network
Let’s address the elephant in the room. Most fundraising advice assumes you have a network. “Just get warm intros from your connections,” they say. “Leverage your network,” they tell you.
But what if you don’t have a Stanford alumni circle? What if you’re not based in Silicon Valley? What if you’re a first-time founder with zero investor connections?
I faced this exact situation when I started fundraising in Spain. No network, no Stanford friends, no investor “besties”. Yet I ended up raising from top-tier VCs and even got meetings with Sequoia, Andreessen Horowitz, and Accel.
Here’s the truth: You don’t need an existing network. You just need to build one systematically.
The Warm Intro System That Actually Works
After spending 3 years cold emailing a General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz with zero response, I changed my approach. Within 15 minutes of using this new system, I got a reply from that same partner.
The shift? I stopped DM’ing investors directly and started DM’ing their portfolio founders instead.
As Marc Andreessen says, “The argument in favor of the warm intro is that it’s the first test of your ability to basically network your way to the investor.” If you can’t get an intro with a VC, how are you going to close massive deals, bring influencers onboard, or present your solution at boards of public companies?
Here’s the step-by-step process I used to get meetings with over 175 investors:
The Portfolio Founder Approach
Step 1: Visit the investor’s website
Go to each target VC’s website and study their portfolio. Look for companies in your sector or adjacent spaces. Research the LinkedIn profiles of the founders.
Step 2: Reach out to 15-20 portfolio founders per VC
For every VC you’re targeting, reach out to 15-20 of their portfolio founders on LinkedIn. Send a personalized connection request explaining you’re researching their investor and would love to learn about their experience.
In my experience, here’s the conversion funnel:
15-20 founders contacted
10 will respond
2-3 will jump on a 15-minute call
1-2 will make a warm intro to their investor
Step 3: The discovery call with portfolio founders
When you get on the call, don’t immediately ask for an intro. Here’s what to do instead:
First, introduce yourself and talk about what you’re building. Keep it concise but compelling.
Let them know you haven’t had any previous interaction with their investor and you’d like to learn about their experience.
Ask specific questions: Did the investor help them in their next round? How was their mentorship? Did they micromanage or give freedom? Were they quick in their due diligence? Are they an overall good partner to have?
Read the room. If there’s chemistry and the conversation flows naturally, kindly ask for a warm introduction to their investor.
Step 4: Why this works better than everything else
When an investor gets an intro from their own portfolio founder, you’re instantly “in the round.” They assume others are already interested—and the conversation starts with FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out), not judgment.
This completely flips the power dynamic in your favor.
Creating Density and Urgency
This portfolio founder hack is powerful, but it won’t build urgency if you don’t execute it correctly. The key is density of meetings.
Don’t reach out to one founder, wait for a response, then reach out to another. That’s a recipe for a 9-month fundraise with no leverage.
Instead, pile up intros and schedule all your investor meetings within a 3-4 week window.
Why this matters:
It helps you balance rejection: Getting a “no” when you have 10 other VCs in your pipeline feels very different than getting a “no” when you’ve been speaking with just one investor for 3 months.
It balances the power dynamics: Your confidence when pitching will be higher if you have 5 VCs reviewing your deck than if you have none.
It helps in negotiations: When you have multiple options, you don’t have to say yes to the first offer that comes your way.
It creates real FOMO: Investors talk to each other. When they hear you’re in conversations with multiple firms, they move faster.
At my pre-seed round, I spoke with about 70 investors. At seed, with around 175. For my last raise, 166 passed before I closed the round. That’s normal. Expect to get at least 99 “no”s before your first “yes”.
The One Intro Rule
Here’s a mistake I see founders make all the time: They get on a call with someone and say, “I need warm intros. Can you forward my deck to anyone who might be interested?”
This approach is a perfect recipe for disaster. Why?
You’re asking that person to go through their entire contact list, consider who might be interested, make multiple decisions, and then forward emails. Most people will freeze up and end up not sharing your message with anyone. Even if they do, it won’t be an intro with someone you know is a great match.
The better approach: Ask each person for ONE specific intro you’ve already researched.
Why this works:
It’s simpler for them—they only have to decide whether to make that one intro or not
You’ve already done the research, so they know why you’re asking
The new lead feels special—they aren’t receiving a generic mass email
In my experience, many people who said yes to one intro often opened more doors than expected
Building Your Story and Generating FOMO
Getting meetings is one thing. Converting them is another.
Here’s what you need to understand: Investors are not rational animals. The nature of their job forces them to move quickly based on limited information. What pushes them to invest is not the data—it’s the feeling of closing a deal that could potentially return their entire fund several times.
Remember the Power Law: 0.1% of startups generate 97% of all exit profits. Out of 100 startups a typical investor backs, only 2-4 will bring returns that multiply their entire fund.
Your job as a founder is to convince investors that your company is poised to be one of those rare success stories.
This means:
Focus on the size of the outcome if successful, rather than the probability of success. The investor will determine your probability of success on their own based on your team, the space, and other factors. Your job is to paint the picture of the massive outcome.
Facts matter only insomuch as they generate emotion. Anyone who’s ever tried to change someone’s opinion using just facts knows that emotions drive decisions, especially when you don’t have complete information. Investors are human too.
Be authentic and passionate. VCs speak with 10 different founders a day, all of them sounding like they’re the next Elon Musk. Don’t fabricate your pitch. Be genuine about what you want to build.
Obsess over the tough questions. Everyone can handle the easy ones. Construct short, simple, and objective arguments for each tough question. As Pascal said, “If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter.”
And most importantly, be extremely optimistic about your fundraise. Casually mention details about your progress with confidence. Investors don’t want to feel like they’re “helping” with their money—charities fill that gap. They want to feel like they’re betting on a winner and getting an extreme return. They need to feel a sense of urgency.
When investors tell you “you’re too early,” it’s rarely about your metrics. The real reasons are usually: they’re afraid to say no outright, there’s no sense of urgency (“Why invest now? I can wait 6 months”), or they lack understanding but don’t want to miss out if a big-name fund decides to invest.
All of these can be summarized in one word: FOMO. So focus on generating it.
The Reality: It’s 50% Company, 50% Process
In the beginning, I did everything wrong. Long decks, wrong investors, no urgency. I’d send messages and wait. I thought fundraising was about vibes and storytelling.
It’s not. Fundraising is 50% about how strong your company is, and 50% about how well you run the process.
If you run the process right, urgency beats traction every single time. This is why you see rounds with minimal traction that make you think, “How the hell did they raise that much money?”
You don’t need to spend thousands of dollars flying to startup events around the world trying to meet investors. You don’t need a Stanford degree or Silicon Valley connections.
You just need LinkedIn, a systematic approach to reaching portfolio founders, and the discipline to create density in your fundraising process.
That’s how I got meetings with Sequoia, a16z, Accel, and other top-tier funds as a European founder with no network. And that’s how you can too.
Special Resource for Founders Raising
We have a long guide with the script I used during the call, a detailed explanation of the storytelling you should use for this, and the exact LinkedIn connection note I used with more than 900 founders to get warm intros. Access this resource here.











Interesting coverage, Daniel! Fundraising is certainly difficult. Having worked with founders based in different geographies, I have seen variations in the rounds, cheque sizes and challenges faced (depending on the ecosystem). For instance Scotland vs Italy, or US vs the UK.
And, I found one of my most favorite graphics by Anna included here as well explaining the rounds. 👍
Great comprehensive guide. That 2-5% seed-to-Series-A graduation rate in Q2 2024 is brutal compared to 2021's 14-15%. The data on dilution decreasing with later stages (19% seed down to 7.3% Series D) is counterintuitive but makes sense once you realize later-stage companies have way more leverage when negotiating. The portfolio founder outreach hack is smart, espcially the density-of-meetings timing strategy.